Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tree Gnomes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-11-20 01:45Z

Tree Gnomes[edit]

{{prod}} was removed, then readded. Since re-adding the tag is not allowed, I've moved this here. I agree with the initial prodder, this is fancruft and should be deleted. Original prod reason: Per WP:FICT, not substantial enough for an article. UtherSRG (talk) 18:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - rogue RuneScape subpage. I was the one who reprodded it after Pyrospirit deprodded. See the article talkpage; Pyrospirit does not oppose deletion after a short discussion. Since deletion is pretty much inevitable, I reprodded per WP:IGNORE/WP:SENSE rather than opening the 10,000th RuneScape related AfD. Tree Gnomes are involved in (AFAIK, i'm a bit nooby in the game) about three game quests out of more than 100, therefore they are notable only by satirical standards. CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 19:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As this article is useless to non-players, it should be removed as funcruft Mamyles 00:07, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 01:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge & redirect to RuneScape combat or something. --Czj 01:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This article has absolutely nothing to do with combat. The closest article we have to it is Runescape locations, and even that wouldn't fit properly. Mamyles 03:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unsourced, WP:NOT a game guide. Sandstein 06:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If we can't have an article about RuneScape races in general (which I'm sure we can't because they aren't very notable and you can only play as one of them), we don't need articles about individual races. Dtm142 01:51, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.