Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treadmill Desk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 03:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Treadmill Desk[edit]

Promotion. Templatehater (talk) 21:41, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:30, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete (G11) — I think I need a treadmill now to burn off all that spam I ate yesterday. Oh, wait; that's the turkey still talking in my stomach! Eh, tastes like spam. MuZemike (talk) 15:59, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a very notable topic. The article is definitely not blatant spam. Most of it is pretty neutral. Using this Google News Archive search, I've found plenty of sources about the treadmill desk. There are sources from The Christian Science Monitor, Time Magazine, The New York Times, The New York Daily News, etc. Cunard (talk) 19:23, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Cunard has demonstrated clear notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the sources found support notability -- Whpq (talk) 18:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.