Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Couture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 00:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Travis Couture[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiography, no evidence that he meets WP:NPOL or WP:GNG Melcous (talk) 02:27, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:50, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:50, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Being the chair of a political party's local chapter in a single county is not a claim of notability that gets a person into Wikipedia in and of itself. Nothing else claimed here is any stronger, and no reliable source coverage is present to get him over WP:GNG. We are not a free public relations platform or a LinkedIn clone, on which anybody is entitled to have an article just because they exist — we're an encyclopedia, on which RS coverage supporting a legitimate and encyclopedic claim of notability has to be present. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 14:52, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Should have been speedily deleted under two criteria. An autobiography on a completely non-notable person. AusLondonder (talk) 17:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see nothing to support an article. (Although it is odd that he shares 2 somewhat unusual names with Travis Couture-Lovelady, an active politician in a different state.) E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.