Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Cloyd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. I don't know whether EngiZe, the creator of the article, actually read the general notability guideline before stating that the three sources he or she cited show that the subject passes that guideline, but if so he has misread it. Three pages each with one brief passing mention (plus in one case a picture caption) do not constitute substantial coverage. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:31, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Travis Cloyd[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. References are single line entries or do not mention article subject. reddogsix (talk) 22:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:02, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nom is correct about current sourcing, and searches did not turn up the type of in-depth coverage needed to establish they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:41, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If this, this and this are not reliable sources, I do not know what is. The sources clearly indicate, at it's worst, that the topic marginally passes WP:GNG for his involvement in production of The Recall and The Humanity Bureau, among others. --EngiZe (talk) 16:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:33, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.