Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trash rock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:40, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trash rock[edit]

A made-up genre built entirely on original research with not a singe reference to support any of the content. A Google search shows no reliable sources to back-up the term as a valid music genre - mainly hitting clothes marketing websites. The Real Libs-speak politely 21:56, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agreed, delete per nom. Fuzbaby (talk) 22:00, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep No indication that nominator has followed all the preliminary alternatives to deletion. -- TheGriefer (talk) 22:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE The above keep vote is the first edit by a new account created within minutes of this AfD. The Real Libs-speak politely 22:11, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now, that's just not nice. -- TheGriefer (talk) 23:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nominator made a good faith effort to find possible sources for verification and was unable to find any, like I just did as well.--Talain (talk) 22:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BEFORE (you know, actual policy) says to use the talk page and talk to the article. Not only has nobody talked with User:Chris Henniker, User talk:Chris Henniker shows that the nominator didn't even bother to notify him. This kind of quick loss of information that's been here for years isn't good. -- TheGriefer (talk) 23:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:27, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Really a WP:NEO. And WP:BEFORE isn't a set of rules that have to be followed step by step, just like notifying the author is suggested, not required. It's nominated, who cares if he discussed it before. We're discussing it now.Niteshift36 (talk) 04:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing GNG. DreamGuy (talk) 16:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I guess I'm done waisting my time on Wikipedia. I tried to figure out the rules, create and edit articles, communicate difficulties on talk-pages, all for the benefit of people interested. But if this bunch of wiki-gestapo keeps undermining the efforts of non-wiki-police-staff, I'm through. Write it all yourself then. I'm out...

I suspect nobody will be writing it since the majority seem to think it's non-notable in the first place. Or I could be wrong. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.