Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transun Travel Ltd.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:08, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transun Travel Ltd.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable company. The article has been written by someone with a conflict of interest. Bob Re-born (talk) 09:52, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. czar · · 15:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. czar · · 15:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Looks like a very minor travel operator to me. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No apparent notability DGG ( talk ) 01:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article has sited secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG LaCharles ( talk ) 10:06, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I took a look at the sources on the page and 1 2 3 and 4 are just passing mentions, 1 and 2 don’t seem to mention subject and 1 2 and 3 just tell of its new destinations. There are a couple of journal articles that I don't have access to but their abstracts don't mention the company. Using the sources in the page appropriately could possibly lead to an article on Tourism in Eastern Europe but I'm not seeing notability for this company based on them. J04n(talk page) 13:42, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't establish basis for notability.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.