Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transnational India-Nepal-Bhutan Upper Himalaya Railway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:22, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transnational India-Nepal-Bhutan Upper Himalaya Railway[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crystal boll. Not even a survey or feasibility study is done. The Banner talk 22:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A proposal at this stage. The article provides a lot of detail that does not appear in any sources. Much of the referencing does not appear to be about this specific proposal, and the material that is about this proposal is essentially that some sort of project is being contemplated. -- Whpq (talk) 16:48, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 04:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 19:32, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Far too much WP:CRYSTAL. My view is that a project like this should not have an article until there is a project which a government (or company) clearly intends to fund. Since this is an interational project, a treaty will be needed, presumably. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It has only been proposed. WP:CRYSTAL. SL93 (talk) 01:05, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.