Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TransNexus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TransNexus[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability guideline for companies. My search did turn up one possibly usable source, but I'm not absolutely convinced of its reliability, and NCORP requires multiple sources to establish notability in any case. – Teratix ₵ 01:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 01:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 01:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 01:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable. Basically all mentions of it come from placed pieces in niche industry publications (e.g. here) and, moreover, the creator of article is an WP:SPA clearly related to the company. WhinyTheYounger (talk) 20:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence the company passes WP:NCOMPANY. Uh, so much spam these days... hmmm, I guess that's normal. Anyway, spam, nuke. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:04, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A longstanding primary-sourced article by a connected contributor, with subsequent additions by a IP and by a WP:COI WP:SPA. The 2007 article identified by the nominator describes the company's technical offering, which serves to verify but does not, I think, establish notability here. My searches are finding various routine announcement items, but these fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.