Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trample

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin | wasn't he just...? 01:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trample[edit]

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. D. Monack | talk 16:25, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. JohnCD (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. It does seem to be a notable activity in the BDSM subculture. Perhaps somehow merge this article with BDSM? The reason I don't vote keep is because the article is too much of a spam trap and is not worth the effort of keeping spam free. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 21:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply and Delete Even if it is notable in BDSM subculture, it should still be in wiktionary. -Reuvenk_{T C} 22:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Perhaps, perhaps not. I'm not at all knowledgable about the subject matter but I don't think it's inconceivable that the subject could develop into an encyclopedic article. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 00:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Quite possibly notable, but it needs some kind of sources. Print is OK too--there should be enough magazie references. DGG (talk) 00:37, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete, seems a dicdef at the moment. Could possibly be turned into a decent article on the BDSM practice in the future, but deleting the article now won't make that any harder. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 00:42, 17 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.