Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trainbaby
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, consensus is that this is unsalvagable. Davewild (talk) 18:34, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Trainbaby[edit]
- Trainbaby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Anthropomorphism of a likely non-notable train. Weird stuff. All online sources I found were of forum pages, youtube hits, facebook entries, flickr hits, and the like. Samuel Tan 05:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. — Wackymacs (talk ~ edits) 08:02, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 09:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Arsenikk (talk) 11:45, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; this is utter nonsense. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 12:22, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: too confusing. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 12:23, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete junk JuJube (talk) 17:31, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NONSENSE or WP:BOLLOCKS. Take your pick. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 21:19, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as has cult appeal amongst trainspotters in the North of England as per [1], though Conditional upon a rewrite DannyM (talk) 22:34, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete --Seems to be a NN trainset. The article does not even explain what makes this particular one distinct from the rest of its class. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:06, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's confusing, nonsensical words jumbled together. It also totally fails the WP:N guideline, if I must say. IceUnshattered (talk) 01:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this totally unverified, unreferenced notability violation that borders on worthiness of speedy deletion. Cliff smith talk 20:23, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.