Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traedonya Chequelle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Traedonya Chequelle[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

First nominated for deletion in 2013, outcome was no consensus. It appears to me that this musician doesn't quite meet WP:MUSICBIO, so let's re-evaluate. This article, brought up in the previous AfD, could be significant coverage, but 1. it's not clear to me how notable this magazine is and 2. the piece seems pretty promotional in nature, so not sure about it. This article is about a group she was/is in (and which I can't find much else about), not about Traedonya individually. Apart from this, nothing beyond coverage in unreliable sources or passing mentions has been produced by either my own searches or the previous AfD. Lennart97 (talk) 22:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 22:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 22:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 22:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I found a lot of articles from not so reliable sources, but nothing picked up by a major reliable source that would really contribute to notability. Just for completeness I'm going to dump some of the sources here, in case anyone wants to assess to see if they think they're more reliable than I do. [1] [2] [3] [4] ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:03, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No real coverage, no fans, no plays, no streaming, no social media. scope_creep^Talk 11:03, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.