Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditions Magazine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Traditions Magazine[edit]
- Traditions Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Magazine existed for only 1 year and the article does not assert its notability. Zero references. The talk page shows that the person who started it thinks it should be deleted. Pigman 00:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per nom as not meeting WP:N, WP:V. Thewinchester (talk) 03:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The closing admin shouldn't forget about the talk page discussion, some merges may need undoing if this is deleted. If "The intentions of the original article(s) were to provide information on the magazine and contributors - most of which are notable authors and known persons." Having notable authors attached makes a magazine noteworthy (at least in my eyes - just like books). We generally don't cut an article just because it ceased publication. That said: this google search is quite telling. With no mention of former listings in the common magazine databases, I'd suggest that the claim was exagerated and that this mag never came off the ground. Delete - Mgm|(talk) 11:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:21, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless notability is satisfied: ex. a reliable publisher, reviews, impact... -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 15:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.