Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trade-Air destinations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Trade Air. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 (T) 14:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trade-Air destinations[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, relevent airline appears to fail WP:GNG and has no article. Mdann52 (talk) 09:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lists of destinations almost certainly fail WP:NOTDIR~~, and when it's a list of destinations for a seemingly nonnotable airline, there's even less reason to keep it. In this case, with no parent article, there's no point to it in the first place~~. Nyttend (talk) 10:07, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No parent article, unsourced, fails GNG. sst✈^discuss 10:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. sst✈^discuss 10:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transport-related deletion discussions. sst✈^discuss 10:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. sst✈^discuss 10:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. sst✈^discuss 10:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Merge but consider renaming it to match parent article Trade Air. MilborneOne (talk) 10:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changed from keep to merge after consideration of later posts. MilborneOne (talk) 09:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for finding it, but it's still an inappropriate directory-style page, content that doesn't belong in the airline article, let alone as a standalone page. Nyttend (talk) 10:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We have had a global AfD on this type of articles at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pages in Category:Lists of airline destinations which has just been closed as a snowball keep. Doesnt mean that this could not be better referenced. MilborneOne (talk) 11:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Snowball kept because of a combination of factors: a pile of people who didn't care about our inclusion criteria, and the nomination's huge scope, which resulted in problems such as the unintentional inclusion of Dubrovnik Airline because it was incorrectly included in the category in question. The latter isn't an issue here, while presumably the closing administrator here will ignore votes without rationales like yours, or "it's useful"/"irrational" votes such as those that swamped the original. Nyttend (talk) 11:07, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Trade Air. Standalone lists of airline destinations are created due to article size considerations, but this is a very short list. sst✈^discuss 12:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Trade Air. Although we do actually list airline destinations (e.g. see American Airlines destinations, British Airways destinations), there is not enough information here to sustain a stand-alone article. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 15:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.