Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toyota HiMedic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) U¹ _quattro TALK 14:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toyota HiMedic[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article relies on one source and by seeing its stub quality, it is barely notable. The HiMedic is better off being mentioned in the Toyota HiAce page. U¹ _quattro TALK 02:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. U¹ _quattro TALK 02:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My intention when I created the page was just to make it a simple disambiguation page to list the generations. Each generation pointed back to suitable generations of the Toyota HiAce page. Kind of like the generational lists at Toyota Sprinter and Toyota Corolla. Disambiguation pages are not known for having lots of text and lots of references. This should have been non-contentious.

As for having a single source, it was only meant to be a list of generations, with the details on the HiAce page. However, Ominae (talk · contribs) has added more more references, so this point is invalid.

If you thought the page was a bit light on details and references, it would have far better to add tags requesting more details and references instead of trying to kill it at birth. Stepho talk 12:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stepho-wrs you could've classified it as a disambiguation page and not as a full on article because as an article it was poorly written and sourced. My intention for this discussion was to delete it due to the aforementioned reasons but since Ominae has improved it, I'd take it down.U¹ _quattro TALK 14:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.