Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toxic Ravine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 21:36, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Toxic Ravine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod declined by author because "you can still download it" which is not an assertation of notability. No sourcing found whatsoever. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:28, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The game exists/existed, but existing is not notability. If there were an entry for the game's creator I'd suggest redirecting there, but since it only exists as a redirect to another game, this is a delete on my end. I found only one mention that could be used as a RS as well as a mention of it being used in a study, but not enough of anything to show it'd pass notability guidelines. Userfication is always a possibility, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:59, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete one of a zillion random shareware games. No notability to speak of. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:42, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 15:23, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One reference to a MacUser issue magazine has been added. Can we gain the notability for this article now ?Zurd (talk) 07:05, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, just one source. Close but no cigar. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:05, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added 2 new references and 2 new external links, is it now good enough for wikipedia's notability policy ? Zurd (talk) 08:44, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NSOFT and WP:GNG. One of many early software games that existed for Mac users. Sources confirm existence but not how it is any different from the rest of them. Funny ^Pika! 03:59, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. While there seems to have been attempts to support the subject's notability via some sources, it just doesn't seem to be enough. MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:18, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.