Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toxic Holocaust

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn Where were all these sources when I went looking? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 01:16, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Toxic Holocaust[edit]

No sources found, band's website is dead. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. These sources? [1], [2], [3], [4].--Michig (talk) 22:52, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

or these? [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. There's also a full-page feature in the November 2008 issue of Terrorizer. So it's a strong as possible Keep for me, even if their website is currently down.--Michig (talk) 23:02, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep per Michig. Seems a slightly strange nomination, given the number of sources. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 23:53, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. A google search alone reveals plenty of reliable sources, and the dead link to the official site doesn't worry me. Webhost providers have trouble all the time and even if that wasn't the case, a band not having an official website, is not a valid reason to delete the article. - Mgm|^(talk) 00:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.