Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Towradgi Public School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 01:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Towradgi Public School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Primary school with no indication of notability. Was successfully prodded back in 2015 see here, so can not be prodded again. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 02:52, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 02:52, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: For what it's worth I was fully prepared to delete this under the rationale given, if it hadn't been for the previous PROD forcing the formality of an AfD. Easy delete !vote. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 02:53, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Fairy Meadow, New South Wales#Education per standard practice. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The school is not mentioned in the proposed target article, but it is mentioned in Towradgi, New South Wales. It seems it has the Towradgi post code, despite the address being listed as Fairy Meadow. Perhaps merge to include the school in Towradgi, New South Wales? I have edited the school's article, added a couple of citations. There is a little about the school being part of a state government pilot program that was successful enough to be expanded, and the school has a continuous history of over 60 years. Jack N. Stock (talk) 07:24, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete given previous PROD and no new notability assessment just delete it.CalzGuy (talk) 07:59, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.