Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Town 'N Country Regional Library

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Tampa–Hillsborough County Public Library System. Having been up for 3 weeks I don't believe consensus would've gone any other way so closing as merge (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Town 'N Country Regional Library[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This library fails WP:GNG. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 18:46, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:37, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:37, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, tentatively, to Tampa–Hillsborough County Public Library System. I haven't searched for sources about this library that would support it being kept as a separate article. But "Delete" is not an appropriate decision when there is the obviously better wp:ATD to merge to the library system article, retaining the edit history at a redirect left behind, to be restored as an article with more material. --do ncr am 17:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:51, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:12, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - to Tampa–Hillsborough County Public Library System. Merge seems more appropriate. Not enough sources available for separate article. CBS527^Talk 15:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.