Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tourism in Kuala Lumpur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Applicable policy here is Wikipedia is not a travel guide - this trumps 'but I like it'. Proto::type 11:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tourism in Kuala Lumpur[edit]

This page holds nothing more than an advertisement for Kuala Lumpur. I did a check, and there does not exist a page of tourism in Paris or other major cities. In addition, it fails Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. le petit vagabond 18:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki ~~to Wikitravel~~. hateless 21:47, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Wait, doesn't look like Wikitravel is a suitable transwiki target. In this case, weak delete works for me, unless there is a suitable transwiki target available. hateless 21:58, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's not an advertisement and it's not an indiscriminate collection of information. It is very nicely organized, well focused, beautifully presented, encyclopedic information. Fg2 01:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom + it is just listcruft. MartinDK 12:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Needs organising, formating, and a introductory section. --Vsion 04:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Requires organizing.Marcusaffleck 12:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and start from a clean table. This advertisement cannot be turned into a proper article. Pavel Vozenilek 02:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Either, it contains good information. but if you guys find it too 'ad-like' i guess the second best is to Wikitravel Kuala Lumpur. As far as I am concern, I personally would like to keep it there.Zack2007 06:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.