Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tourism in Ahmedabad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Tourism in Gujarat. That is clearly the consensus, but I am also personally taking the decision to delete the history, as it is purely promotional, and there is no justification for keeping it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tourism in Ahmedabad[edit]

Tourism in Ahmedabad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTTRAVEL. Obvious tourist brochure content. Wikipedia is not the Lonely Planet. Ajf773 (talk) 06:18, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 07:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 07:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - clearly not an encyclopaedia article Spiderone 12:25, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Tourism in Gujarat. This could be cleaned up and properly sourced like many other tourism in city articles, but redirect for now.Charles (talk) 11:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:13, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is relisted to gain a clearer consensus on whether the close should be a delete or a redirect, as those are the two current options. Other opinions are welcome as well.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 18:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 08:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment as the nominator - this AfD has been relisted enough times now. I give preference to redirect as per User:Charlesdrakew. If the article is ever recreated it can also be nominated again in another AfD should the content continue to be non-compliant. Ajf773 (talk) 12:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect as suggested. Bearian (talk) 21:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.