Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Touchstone Technologies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 02:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Touchstone Technologies[edit]
- Touchstone Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No independent sources, created by an officer of the company (CEO, apparently, which may indicate the significance of the firm since I don't see much chance of Bill Gates editing the article on Microsoft). Cruftbane 14:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per Cruftbane: another unsourced article about a tech business. Also, they refer to one of their products as a "solution", without being in the chemistry business; this is a per se neutrality problem, and tainted English usage. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. MBisanz talk 18:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As it stands, the company is apparently not notable. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 19:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is a borderline WP:CSD#G11. It reads like it came right from the company's brochure. --L. Pistachio (talk) 21:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 22:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (unless sourced). The tone problem could easily be fixed and there's encyclopedic content in the article. But alas, there are no citations to back up the article's notability claims and I could find nothing on google other than a few articles and buying guides that list it among many other small companies.Wikidemo (talk) 17:52, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.