Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Totally TV
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:45, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Totally TV
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Totally TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An impressive amount of subscribers, but there isn't coverage in reliable sources to match. Does not meet WP:GNG, article creator appears to be a UPE creating articles about the channel's productions. signed, Rosguill talk 00:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 00:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per GNG and NORG. This is the coverage I could find:
- Not enough to meet GNG; certainly not enough to meet NORG. userdude 00:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC); struck duplicate entry 01:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 12:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Lack of coverage that is significant in independent, reliable sources. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.