Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total video converter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:25, 8 October 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Total video converter[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most third-party coverage is in the form of download sites, which do not establish notability. I think this fails WP:SIGCOV. sst^flyer 10:33, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agreed, the only coverage is from download sites. Not notable apparently. Cosmic Sans (talk) 13:11, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Another WP:ADVERT for another run-of-the-mill video converter. Nate • (chatter) 13:56, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. WP:ROUTINE coverage but not much else. --Non-Dropframe _talk 14:41, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now until a better article can be made and feel free to draft and userfy. SwisterTwister talk 05:39, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete This may be a popular piece of sofware with independent reviews written about it, but nothing written in the article really establishes why it's noteworthy. Putting aside the poorly-conceived page on Wikipedia:Notability_(software) (which is about as blatantly deletionist as the rest of the notability "essays," this fails to have any exceptional sources or non-commercial importance. --69.204.153.39 (talk) 18:30, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.