Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Drama Wiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:25, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Total Drama Wiki[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:WEB. No evidence found that this is notable Triplestop x3 20:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: By any chance though that I could continue to improve the article while moving it back to my userspace? ☭Pickbothmanlol☭ 20:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nominated. Fails WP:WEB. Crafty (talk) 20:24, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significance given in the article. A8 UDI 20:26, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nominated. I agree with User:Craftyminion that this article is not likely to meet WP:WEB. Moreover, I fail to see how this article could be improved to meet WP:WEB within a reasonable timeframe (e.g. 30-60 days). I mean, its not likely to win any awards or get any notable mentions in a reliable source by that time. And, in the chance that I am wrong, the page can be recreated with the necessary citations. Quanticle (talk) 20:40, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable website. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 23:02, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:WEB. Joe Chill (talk) 23:54, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Userfy Not notable; fails WP:WEB. --Cybercobra (talk) 03:44, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy per author's request. if notability is sourced, allow the article back. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:55, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or userfy Delete per WP:WEB or userfy per user's request. Although I strongly suggest the author find third party reliable sources.--TParis00ap (talk) 15:49, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WEB ArcAngel (talk) 20:17, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy. Though currently non-notable, it can be improved in Pickbothmanlol's userspace until the wiki does become notable. Dalekusa (talk) 21:06, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We don't have WP:JAW for Just Another Wiki? Shame, very very few Wikia-hosted wikis can be considered notable at any rate and this isn't a member of that small group. treelo _radda 18:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:WEB. Oppose userfying, as the article's creator has been indefinitely blocked. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 16:22, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.