Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TotalView

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 00:00, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TotalView[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Also seems like an advert, and non-notable software Mdann52 (talk) 15:42, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:33, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:33, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - There are borderline PR sources covering this, including one in the article and http://insidehpc.com/2013/04/23/totalview-debugger-shortens-app-development-cycles-at-european-universities/. Software also is mentioned on numerous university sites, though either in an incidental or how-to context. Not enough RS reference coverage to firmly establish notability. Page was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 01:22, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 18:04, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.