Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torrent episode downloader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mgm|^(talk) 14:27, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Torrent episode downloader[edit]

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Schuym1 (talk) 15:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Having been featured on lifehacker ([1]) and being very popular amongst torrent users (More people use this than ABC_(Yet_Another_BitTorrent_Client) , this articles notability should be apparent despite the lack of talk about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.175.132.243 (talk) 03:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That doesn't show notability per WP:N. Schuym1 (talk) 05:32, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 07:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:01, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- Here is another article on lifehacker about it. [2]ValerieAustin (talk) 02:27, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Popularity != notability, and this article does not even give sources for claimed popularity. Sources given are trivial: This is just another torrent client, and is Non-notable.Yobmod (talk) 11:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 01:00, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence of notability regardless of how widely used it may be. JJL (talk) 01:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No claims of notability. No independent third party coverage or references. Something else exists is not a reason to keep. Canterbury Tail talk 03:49, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.