Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torre San Vincenzo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of tallest buildings in Italy. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 09:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Torre San Vincenzo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unsourced article without any indication of notability. It's a large office building, and that's it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 00:00, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Genoa, or perhaps Weak Keep, because the Italian Wikipedia seems to have a sizable article on this building - however, I can't read Italian so it may be an article on another building with the same name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheepythemouse (talk • contribs) 01:15, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it certainly appears to be the same building as the Italian Wikipedia has an article on, but I wouldn't call it "sizeable": it's under 2Kb! Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 15:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment My knowledge of Italian is rudimentary, but even so it is adequate to convince me that this article is an only slightly shortened version of the Italian Wikipedia one - the differences seem to consist of a couple more names for the building, one not very substantial reference and links to other Wikipedia articles which actually work. The building was not the tallest even in Genoa when built, so unless being over 100 metres in height for a building from before 1970 is automatically notable, I am not currently seeing any reason to keep. PWilkinson (talk) 17:47, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's nothing at least minimally better for a better notable article. SwisterTwister talk 07:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~. No convincing reason to merge, and none of the content is sourced. Nothing much found from a web search to indicate that the building is notable enough. --Michig (talk) 07:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC) Support redirect per Cavarrone below. --Michig (talk) 05:48, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 06:52, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of tallest buildings in Italy, there are a few results in Google Books but they are only visible as snippets so they are difficult to evaluate. Possibly notable, possibly not, for now a redirect to the relevant list (where Torre San Vincenzo is 29th) seems a reasonable solution. Cavarrone 05:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect would be reasonable, although the entry in that list also appears to be unsourced. --Michig (talk) 05:48, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of tallest buildings in Italy. Not finding source coverage to qualify an article. However, it's listed at the list article, and this is a valid search term. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.