Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tornado outbreak of January 24-25, 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:11, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tornado outbreak of January 24-25, 2023[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly organized article started by a new user. This article goes against the general criteria for outbreak articles followed by the wikiproject, and other users had previously decided against an article at Talk:Tornadoes of 2023. United States Man (talk) 02:53, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – What US Man said. Poodle23 (talk) 02:59, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Multiple users in WP:Weather already was having a discussion about not creating an article. It does not follow WP:NWEATHER and is poorly organized. I wish speedy delete could occur, but unfortunately, it doesn't qualify for that. Elijahandskip (talk) 03:18, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Florida, Louisiana, and Texas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:21, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify so that the draft could be improved if desired. Delete after Poodle23's comment. ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 08:27, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – I'm not going to try and make an argument against this, but i will say what multiple people here have already said: Making an article about it was decided against here. Poodle23 (talk) 13:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The event as a whole will probably be under a winter storm article, so its not like it won't be in an article. An article for just the tornadoes, though, is ridiculous. Please delete this and try again with a more notable event. ChessEric (talk · contribs) 15:17, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only thing notable about this outbreak is an EF3 tornado that caused a tornado emergency and 6 injuries. This, however, is not enough to justify an article. RandomInfinity17 (talk) 23:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect To appropriate section on Tornadoes of 2023. No reason not to have a redirect. As an aside, if this was to be a winter storm article, shouldn’t someone make one? 71.125.62.146 (talk) 21:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Based on geolocation and edit history, this IP is one of the many socks of Andrew5. Thus, it should have no valid opinion as a frequent block evader. United States Man (talk) 23:10, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article does not pass WP:NWEATHER guidelines. Already had a discussion about being against the idea of creating an article about this tornado outbreak. Article is poorly organized and the only sign of notability is about the Pasadena tornado, but isn't enough for an article about this tornado outbreak. Article can be also said in Tornadoes of 2023#January 24–25. Tails Wx 21:50, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.