Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torion Sellers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:57, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Torion Sellers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from the fact that the page is almost entirely unsourced, the page is written in such a way to clearly promote the subject. Statements such as "Inspired by the solid work ethic and artistic integrity of Michael Jackson" and "Listing more words on a page won’t do the vastness of Torion’s talent or brilliance justice. The vibrant colorful music he creates, that brims with life, authenticity and possibility, can only be heard and felt." are incredibly inappropriate for an encyclopedic article. A search for the artist on google finds passing mentions in articles but nothing to indicate notability. At best, WP:TOOSOON. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The subject is not ready for its own article space. The sources provided are weak and not reliable enough to prove he is worthy of article space in Wikipedia. In my perspective, subject should wait until he receives more in-depth news coverage by reliable sources, if it happens. Scorpion293 (talk) 03:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:34, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Scorpion and nom - subject fails GNG —Мандичка^YO 😜 18:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clear advertising alone and WP:NOT applies. SwisterTwister talk 02:53, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.