Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torahism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted by Lectonar (talk · contribs); rationale was "this is a fringiesh rant, see WP:NOT things made up one day, WP:ESSAY at best, but not even worth having in user-space". Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Torahism[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Now since the article creator removed spam link (and therefore the G11 tag) then I present this Afd.

Non-notable neologism; original research; personal views/opinions. E Wing (talk) 09:36, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete for at least half of the possible reasons for deletion. In short, it's a rant, or a WP:ESSAY if we want to be formal about it, and clearly falls under WP:NOT. Zachlipton (talk) 09:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW delete, unsourced rambling, non-notable fringe view, etc, etc. Hairhorn (talk) 13:10, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Complete original research and opinion. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.