Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top current serials in india
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Lear's Fool 05:41, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Top current serials in india[edit]
- Top current serials in india (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is purely an original research (or based on some spoiler–unreliable website), because in India audience measurement is not robust as Nielsen ratings system in U.S. or Canada. — Bill william comptonTalk 03:48, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — --Darkwind (talk) 04:07, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — --Darkwind (talk) 04:08, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – per nom. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 04:14, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no referencesCurb Chain (talk) 11:19, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Unrefed, fancruft, original research. Delete ASAP. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 03:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - because in India there is no reliable system of audience measurement, and India is multilingual country - and only serials made in Hindi is listed here. Clearly fancruft. Delete ASAP Wikiglobaleditor (talk) 08:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Because it is unreliable (without any source or reference) and clearly an act of a troll..ⓔⓐⓡⓣⓗ ⓢⓗⓞ©ⓚⓔⓡ (talk) 15:28, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It shouldn't be deleted it's a very good thing I love it thanks to whoever made it I love you so much it's a great resource that is very true — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.93.81.3 (talk) 19:17, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.