Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Kuzub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Kuzub[edit]

Delete Fails notability simultaneously fails "Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject)" Self advertisement. attempt to hijack notability. Likely self written. data referenced solely by the authors personal website which is in fact copy and paste. Article is linked with anything related to the city likely as a way of creating notability for the Authors Brand (Musical recording) or as way to create notability where there is not. Personal Propaganda should not be tolerated on Wikipedia. A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Lou mann (talk) 17:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trix312 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as G11 or G12, they both work since it is a bunch of directly plagarised spam. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Talain (talk • contribs)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --
Speedy Delete Blatant self advertising. Google turns up 3 hits, first this wikipage, second his own webpage, and third his facebook page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuzbaby (talk • contribs)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.
Delete I couldnt' find any independent coverage and article looks like spam. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChildofMidnight (talk • contribs)
Comment Due to an broken "ref" tag in the nomination statement, I had to remove all the signatures to keep them from expanding to my username. Also removed some vandalism. I'm going to try and sign the comments by hand. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now it's readable. My apologies for using the "unsigned" template but I knew of no better way of attributing the !votes. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing it!Fuzbaby (talk) 13:58, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.