Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Grimaud
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 23:35, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tony Grimaud[edit]
I don't see why Tony Grimaud's article had been marked for deletion. I am sure others would want to add and improve on the page. Why be so quick to judge and condemn? So come on guys, get his page back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.109.80.98 (talk) 16:12, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Tony Grimaud (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this musician. Joe Chill (talk) 14:31, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 20:39, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - The article never states what he has done. There's no indication of albums, or touring. The critical praise is unsourced. A search for sources turns up event listings such as [1], [2], [3] but these establish that he exists and does not establish him as notable. -- Whpq (talk) 20:21, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:11, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.