Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tonka search & rescue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hasbro Interactive. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 03:58, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tonka Search & Rescue[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Game does not assert any notablility. This article is nothing but an unsourced stub with only one external link (that goes to the Mobygames website). Also fails WP:GNG (no reception for this game, no significant coverage. etc.). Possible redirect to Tonka (which is way more notable than this). trainfan01 talk 16:23, October 28, 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Hasbro Interactive per WP:PRODUCT (it's included in the list of games there). I could not find any reviews of this game. Marasmusine (talk) 16:10, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as stated by Marasmusine --Teancum (talk) 13:29, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.