Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomorrow (Emma Bunton song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all, except redirect Sunshine On A Rainy Day and Sunshine on a Rainy Day to Zoë (singer). —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-29 07:18Z

Tomorrow (Emma Bunton song)[edit]

The article relates to an album track on an Emma Bunton album. The page contains no useful information - and other additions such as song writers already appear on the album page (Free Me)). There is, imo, no reason for this article to be created; its hard to see how it can be expanded - and any information that is added can be incorporated into the album article. Rimmers 21:20, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: I've merged all the nominations - plus others, together. The articles up for nomination also include A Girl Like Me (Emma Bunton song), A World Without You, Been There, Done That (Emma Bunton song), Better Be Careful, Breathing (Emma Bunton song), High On Love, Lay Your Love On Me (Emma Bunton song), No Sign Of Life, She Was A Friend Of Mine, Something So Beautiful (Emma Bunton song), Spell It OUT (Emma Bunton song), Sunshine On A Rainy Day, Tomorrow (Emma Bunton song), Who The Hell Are You (Emma Bunton song) and You Are (Emma Bunton song).

This is part of the song project on wikipedia, hence invalid for deletion.Zigzig20s 21:52, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Being part of a WikiProject does not grant immunity from AFD. --Dhartung | Talk 04:49, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable album track. There's barely any information that is not already on the album page. -- Kicking222 22:02, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non notable song and there's nothing special about it. Jayden54 22:56, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~. Nominator, please combine these songs into one nomination. --Dhartung | Talk 23:22, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all. Thanks, nominator. --Dhartung | Talk 04:49, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom and Dhartung. Danny Lilithborne 02:50, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Nothing of importance here that I can see. If there's nothing to say about a song aside from its title, length, performer(s), and topic, there's no reason it should have its own article. Putting the info at the album page is quite enough. Shimeru 04:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom KnightLago 17:18, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Very few songs are notable enough to have an article, and these songs certainly are not notable enough. And, as another editor already mentioned, just because these are the product of Wikiproject does not mean that they can't be deleted. --The Way 20:27, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Sunshine On A Rainy Day to Zoe (singer), as her version was a UK top ten single and is a valid search term. Delete others.Eludium-q36 22:26, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sunshine on a Rainy Day and expand for information on the Zoe single and mention Emma's. Also Keep any songs that were released as singles from this album. No opinion on the rest. --badlydrawnjeff talk 01:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
None of these songs were released as singles. Rimmers 01:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom, redirect "Sunshine" per others. All of these were solely album tracks. SKS2K6 06:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.