Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Car Wash Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect can be restored at editorial discretion (or WP:REFUND if the history is needed) Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy Car Wash Systems[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable and promotional. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:58, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:58, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Legacypac (talk) 11:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete: While there do appear to be reliable, independent sources available with in-depth coverage per WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH; these sources lack a broad audience; they are either specialist car wash industry publications or local news. --Hazarasp (talk) 12:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. adverisement. The contents is utterly trivial, as it is baased on mere announcements. DGG ( talk ) 21:19, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:11, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.