Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomm Mandryk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – GorillaWarfare ^{talk • contribs} 00:15, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tomm Mandryk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiographical article. Does not seem to satisfy WP:PEOPLE, but also does not seem to qualify for CSD#A7. References are listed (some reliable), but they do not seem to assert enough notability for the subject. Most sources mention how subject has raised funds, althought most of the article is original research and unencyclopedic. –Dream out loud (talk) 22:59, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, although a little reluctantly. Certainly, a motivated young man who wants to do good, and has carried through that desire with action. However, the coverage, is light, and comes only from community newspapers. That's not enough to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now. He sounds like a fine young man (although a lot of the information is unverified and the tone of the article is way too reverential), but the notability is just not there. I find one newspaper reference, in Niagara This Week. A CBC interview is mentioned but I could not find it. Three awards are claimed, but there is no indication of who actually presents the Youth Citizen of the Year Award or the Social Justice Award, while the Lieutenant Governor's Award turns out to be given to 1100 secondary school students every year [1]. Nice, but not enough. --MelanieN (talk) 01:01, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.