Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tombstone Junction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tombstone Junction[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unreferenced article about non notable defunct amusement park WuhWuzDat 18:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This appears to be a regional attraction that has been covered in the area press over a long period of time. It's opening was noted. And coverage continues over its lifetime of operation: [1], [2], [3], [4]. Apparently, magician Lance Burton got started performing at the park. It's unusual characteristics has been noted in an unusual guidebook. -- Whpq (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It ain't Coney Island, but as Whpq pointed out, it does pass our notability standards. An entity being defunct is not a reason for an article to be deleted. I dare the the nom to AfD Pan American World Airways with the same rationale. --Oakshade (talk) 04:10, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
'Keep - Significant enough for its own article. Dough 48 72 20:59, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article is significant and passes standards. J.Rly (talk) 04:42, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.