Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomax7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedied. android 79 15:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tomax7[edit]

nn company, reads like an advert RJFJR 19:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, or a vanity page for Tom McLaughlin. Delete. Kafziel 19:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete absolutely no assertion of notability whatsoever. WP:NOT the yellow pages. Just zis Guy you know? 22:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Whoops! VanityCruft. Needs the über-patronising "mistaken user page" tag Deizio 22:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- NN business, WP:VSCA, though possibly minus the C. But I wouldn't argue the point. Haikupoet 04:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable advertising. —GrantNeufeld 22:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy. {{db-bio}}; check this version. ~ PseudoSudo 07:36, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- That's not the original version, not the same IP as the creator...it could easily be vandalism. I don't think we can assume it's about a person even though it says it's about a company just because that means we can speedy it. NickelShoe 21:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Read it. It is about a person. The first two sentences make vague mention of a company. The remaining paragraphs are about nothing but Tom McLaughlin. Kafziel 04:40, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have read it, and agree that it focuses on the person. I do not think that that is sufficient grounds to speedy it, since it claims to be about a company and then gets off track. NickelShoe 14:22, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So I can write an article about myself, as long as I title it "Kafziel 1.0" and nobody can speedy it? That's ridiculous. It doesn't "get off track", it's never about any company. Look at the talk page. The guy admits to having created this as a vanity page. Kafziel 14:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.