Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomato Torrent (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tomato Torrent[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established for BitTorrent client, abandoned many years ago, never got GNG coverage, unlikely to get coverage in future since project was abandoned. See also arguments of previous AfD. Ysangkok (talk) 15:37, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 15:37, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 17:38, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Not seeing reviews for this to pass NSOFT, and frankly, this article is totally uninformative - it contains just basic directory info (version, OS, etc.). A mention in a list should be good enough for such content. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:08, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about the torrent. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 10:00, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.