Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomas Evjen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 20:38, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tomas Evjen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person who was editor of a small local newspaper and produced films, one of which were notable. His untimely death at age 39 generated news pieces when it happened, and also generated this Wikipedia article, but I'm concerned whether there is actually a lasting notability. Geschichte (talk) 16:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep His film has an article, his manner of death adds to the notability. Also is indexed in the VIAF, so he has some history in publications. Would need more from the Norwegian sources. Oaktree b (talk) 20:27, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

His film has an article, but WP:NOTINHERITED. Deaths are not notable if there is no lasting significance per WP:ONEEVENT and WP:10YT. Geschichte (talk) 10:01, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:22, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.