Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Wright (British actor)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-28 14:49Z
Tom Wright (British actor)[edit]
- Tom Wright (British actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Originally tagged with {{subst:prod}} for the same reasons as this AFD:
- How notable is this young lad? Moreover, IMDb doesn't know of anything named Brum Doctors, and Google only picks up information about it in the form of a British forum post.
Notability does not seem to have been addressed well since removal of the template, hence this AFD. Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 21:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletions. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 23:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - perhaps the reason that IMDb has never heard of "Brum Doctors" is because you're confusing two series - Brum (television) and Doctors (BBC soap opera). He is mentioned at IMDb, BTW - here, but there seems little there to suggest his notability. Grutness...wha? 23:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "Sources: written by agent and casting directors"!!! The JPStalk to me 21:54, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Majorly (Talk) 13:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. First written by User:Wright25, which is suspicious that this article is self-advertisement. Likely merely another out-of-work actor. Anthony Appleyard 17:10, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless independent quotes are added (some reviews would be helpful too) Alf photoman 14:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.