Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Tayback (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Tayback[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Previously deleted in 2017. Edwardx (talk) 09:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not satisfy acting notability or general notability. An article should speak for itself, but there is nothing in the article that makes any claim of general notability.

The filmography lists four films, but none of them show significant roles:

Film		Significant Role
The Hidden II	Not mentioned in article	No
Undercover Heat	No article, only a redirect to a list	No
Jimi, 1996	No article	No
Grizzly Adams and the Legend of Dark Mountain	No article	No

A review of the references shows that they may be the results of a naïve Google search. They all reference to the subject, which means that the search was properly done. They are also all properly formatted, which show that the author has read Referencing for Beginners. None of them are independent significant secondary coverage. The references are all consistent with the article, in backing up the run-of-the-mill career that is documented in the article.

Number	Reference	Remarks	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1	Graffiti Gold Show	Ad for a show, with a link about the subject as one of the performers'	No			No
2	Graffiti Gold Show	Another page similar to 1	No			No
3	Open Powerlifting	List of results in a powerlifting competition	No	No		No
4	Open Powerlifting	List of results in another powerlifting competition	No	No		No
5	Cliffiestone	A blog page which discusses a meeting with the subject	No		No	No
6	Open Powerlifting	A list of all of the subject's results in competitions	No			No
7	Graffiti Gold Show	Ad for a show, with a bio sketch of the subject as one of the performers	No			No
8	MUBI.com	Documents a non-significant movie role	No	No		No
9	Moviefit.me	Describes another non-significant movie role	No	No		No
10	Binged.com	Lists non-significant movie roles	No	No		No
11	Pinterest.ca	Describes a non-significant movie role, and is user-provided content	No	No	No	No
12	Film Affinity.com	Describes a role in a non-notable movie, and is a social medium	No	No	No	No
13	Moviefit.me	Describes role in another non-significant movie	No	No		No
14	KAZM Radio.com	Web site of the subject's radio station	No			No

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:35, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Robert McClenon's source analysis. Available sources are not indepentent enough to meet GNG and does not have enough significant roles for WP:NACTOR Qwaiiplayer (talk) 18:41, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.