Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Papworth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  13:33, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Tom Papworth

Tom Papworth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:POLITICIAN only being elected to Bromley Council which is hardly "state/province wide". Also doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG as all the references are either trivial coverage, such as election results, or are not independent of the subject. Dpmuk (talk) 00:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Keep - In addition to being elected to office there is a range of independent coverage involving Papworth:

• Financial Times - Immigration policy seen as threat to growth
• Business article quoting Papworth in capacity of Fellow of Adam Smith Institute on Zombie companies
• Express - national coverage citing Papworth on zombie companies
• BBC - Companies article

Also a set of local news stories:

• Local news item relating to charity run
• Mice Hotel
• Appointed LD Leader
• Planning in relation to Crystal Palace Park

SheffGruff (talk) 13:11, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

• Delete Seems to be a local officeholder who has been mentioned in some reliable sources. Does not appear to have received substantial coverage in reliable independent sources that aren't local. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:56, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

• weak keep Local councillors aren't inherently notable, but this one seems to squeak through on account of his other involvements. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:53, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
• Delete. I checked the refs and they are all trivial mentions, usually just mentioning his name and nothing more. Szzuk (talk) 21:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.