Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Ivers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 13:33, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Ivers[edit]

Tom Ivers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I PRODed this bio stub. Another editor deprodded it after adding a reference. However the ref added only includes a passing mention of the subject, and the biographical details in the article remain unsourced. The subject was the author of multiple books but I don’t see that he is clearly notable. Mccapra (talk) 04:51, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 04:51, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 04:51, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 04:51, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unable to find any indication of notability. Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, WP:AUTHOR, WP:NHORSERACING, and WP:NEQUESTRIAN. Steve Quinn (talk) 06:34, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails as per nom. Barca (talk) 01:32, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Horse racing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete his contributions to horse training may be notable, but we lack the sourcing to show that. Wikipedia is built on verifiability and we lack verrification here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete failure to show WP:SIGCOV.Strandvue (talk) 00:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.