Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Connell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:37, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Connell[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. Just a journalist doing their job. No awards, no in-depth coverage. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:50, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:01, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:24, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:24, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Negligible independent reliable sources about the subject. Aoziwe (talk) 11:00, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:BIO. No substantial independent reliable sources. Cabrils (talk) 04:28, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.