Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Bukovac
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tom Bukovac[edit]
- Tom Bukovac (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Absolutely no reliable sources found pertaining to him proper, just trivial mentions found. Despite multiple credits, he does not appear to be notable without any sources to verify so much that he exists. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd like to point out that a musician can meet any of the 11 WP:MUSIC criteria without having references pertaining just to them. That is just criterion #1 (WP:GNG), one of the many criteria that can be applied. It should not be used as a sole reason for deletion. - Mgm|(talk) 10:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Still, even the sources I'm finding that mention him and someone else focus more on the someone else and aren't really "non-trivial". Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- True, but the article is about a session guitarist and a career built on accompanying others on their albums and on tour. So there's no claim that he's a star, just that he's notable in that capacity, which there is ample evidence for. Whether there's enough substantial coverage of that role is another matter, and it's not entirely clear, but I think cumulatively it's enough. He's played with some big time acts over a substantial career with many credits. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Still, even the sources I'm finding that mention him and someone else focus more on the someone else and aren't really "non-trivial". Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd like to point out that a musician can meet any of the 11 WP:MUSIC criteria without having references pertaining just to them. That is just criterion #1 (WP:GNG), one of the many criteria that can be applied. It should not be used as a sole reason for deletion. - Mgm|(talk) 10:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Google news has quite a few mentions of the guy on major tours and album performances. I don't see substantial coverage of him in particular however, but the breadth of accomplsihment seems notable to me. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party sources WP:MUSICBIO. JamesBurns (talk) 02:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.