Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Barry (political analyst)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:46, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Barry (political analyst)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with no independent references Rathfelder (talk) 07:23, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:18, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:19, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:19, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:20, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no independent sources. Best, GPL93 (talk) 12:29, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete page has been tagged for souruing since 2016, and still lacks INEDEPENDENT sources. I ran a couple of keyword searches, without finding anything like WP:SIGCOV. Please feel free to ping me to reconsider if anyone manages to source it properly. I am always willing to being persuaded by good sources. E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:40, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.