Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Donovan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:04, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Donovan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 17:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't come close to meeting the notability requirements at WP:NPOL. AusLondonder (talk) 19:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. County council is not a level of office that confers an automatic WP:NPOL pass, but the article is not showing strong evidence that he's received enough reliable source coverage to clear the notability conditions for local officeholders — it depends far more strongly on primary sources and raw tables of election results than notability-assisting coverage, and the few acceptable sources are just the expected level of coverage that any county councillor in any county could always expect to receive in the local media. Bearcat (talk) 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Elected official, but a county commissioner of a rural and lightly populated region of Washington state. Not seeing a pass due to Assistant Professor status. This might be a TOOSOON situation, of course, but I'm not seeing enough for a Keep as things sit. Carrite (talk) 04:41, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.