Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tod Nielsen
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Tod Nielsen[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tod Nielsen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Businessperson with no significant independent sourcing. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:35, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete the business may be notable, he clearly is not.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.